Open Menu
Home
Docket
Claims Register
Register
FAQs
Contact
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Platinum Management (NY) LLC,
et al.
Platinum Receivership
Court Docket
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Nevertheless, the Court will indulge the possibility that counsel were simply carried away by overzealousness rather than acting in bad faith. Accordingly, no monetary sanctions will be imposed. See Schlaifer Nance & Co. v. Estate of Warhol, 194 F.3d 323,. 336 (2d Cir. 1999) ("In order to impose sanctions pursuant to its inherent power, a district court must find that: (1) the challenged claim was without a colorable basis and (2) the claim was brought in bad faith, i.e., motivated by improper purposes such as harassment or delay."). If there are any further violations of the rules, however, the Court will not exercise such forbearances. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 1/7/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-06658-JSR, 1:18-cv-10936-JSR(jwh) (Entered 01/13/2020)
(Docket No. 502)
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jed S. Rakoff: ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/26/2020 at 03:30 PM before Judge Jed S. Rakoff., Oral Argument set for 3/26/2020 at 03:30 PM before Judge Jed S. Rakoff.). (Kotowski, Linda) (Entered 01/08/2020)
(Docket No. )
AFFIRMATION of Warren E. Gluck, Regarding Possible Monetary Sanction Related to Opposition to Ezra Beren's Motion to Dismiss re: [499] Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,,,,,,,,, . Document filed by Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund L.P., Christopher Smith, Martin Trott. (Gluck, Warren) (Entered 01/03/2020)
(Docket No. 501)