Court Docket
United States District Court
Eastern District of New York
Platinum Receivership
Case No. 1:16-cv-6848 (BMC)(VMS)
| View Dockets: | 1-50 | 51-100 | 101-150 | 151-200 | 201-250 | 251-300 | 301-350 | 351-400 |
| 401-450 | 451-500 | 501-550 | 551-600 | 601-650 | 651-700 | 701-717 |
The docket is currently displayed in reverse chronological order. To display the docket in chronological order, please click here.
| Date | Court Document Number | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2024 | 704 | MOTION for Attorney Fees / Twenty-Sixth Interim Application of Goldin Associates, LLC. for Allowance of Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Incurred During the Period October 1, 2023 Through and Including December 31, 2023 by Goldin Associates, LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A., # (2) Exhibit B., # (3) Exhibit C., # (4) Exhibit D., # (5) Exhibit E., # (6) Exhibit F., # (7) Proposed Order) (Weinick, Erik) |
| 03/19/2024 | 703 | MOTION for Attorney Fees / Twenty-Sixth Joint Interim Application of the Receiver and Otterbourg P.C. for Allowance of Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Incurred During the Period October 1, 2023 Through and Including December 31, 2023 by Otterbourg P.C., Receiver. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-SFAR, # (2) Exhibit B- Professional Fee Summary, # (3) Exhibit C- Project Code Summary, # (4) Exhibit D-Receiver Time Records, # (5) Exhibit E-Otterbourg Time Records, # (6) Exhibit F- Expense Summary, # (7) Exhibit G-Otterbourg Expense Records, # (8) Exhibit H- Certification, # (9) Proposed Order) (Weinick, Erik) |
| 03/13/2024 | Minute Entry and Order for Oral Argument on Receiver's Omnibus Motion [597]. Counsel for the Receiver and Claimants appeared via Zoom. The Court heard oral argument on the motion. Decision reserved. See transcript for details (Court Reporter: Charleane Heading). (PW) | |
| 03/12/2024 | 702 | STATUS REPORT / The Receiver's March 12, 2024 Interim Status Report to the Court by Receiver (Weinick, Erik) |
| 03/12/2024 | ORDER re: [700] [701]. The Court's Scheduling Order stands as written. The Receiver is objecting to the claims and therefore shall proceed first before each claimant/attorney. As far as the topic of the arguments, the parties are free to address any topics they want that are raised by the current claims and objections. The parties should be aware, however, that the Court is not going to decide the priority issue in the abstract, that is, it is first going to decide, to the extent the Receiver disputes the validity of any claim at law, whether the claim is legally valid. Only if the Court decides the claim is legally valid will it then proceed to determine the equitable priority issue, and it is possible that determination will not occur until the Court hears objections to the Receiver's proposed plan of distribution when it is submitted. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/12/2024. (PW) | |
| 03/11/2024 | 701 | Letter dated March 11, 2024 in Response Dkt. No. 700. by Receiver (Weinick, Erik) |
